Stance Analysis Dashboard

LLM stance scores for French and Arabic newspapers on the Algerian question, compared across eight models including a fine-tuned Gemma 4 DPO endpoint. Scores run from 1 (strongly pro-colonial) to 5 (strongly anti-colonial).

Sources: Al-Umma (El Ouma), Al-Alam, Al-Saada Coverage: 1933–1955 Gold labels: 638 human-annotated articles

Stance Scale

1Strongly pro-colonial
2Administrative normalization
3Neutral / ambivalent
4Nationalist reformist
5Strongly anti-colonial

Newspaper Coverage

Newspaper Language Year Start Year End
Al-Umma (El Ouma)Arabic19331938
Al-SaadaArabic19301954
Al-AlamArabic19471954
Le FigaroFrench19201955
L'Echo d'AlgerFrench19341950
L'HumaniteFrench19201944
Scores are means of LLM-assigned stance labels (1–5) for Algeria-relevant articles only. Hover over any data point to see the mean score and its plain-language label. Use the newspaper dropdown on the year chart to switch between sources.

Mean stance by year — per newspaper

Select a newspaper from the dropdown. Each line is one model. Dotted vertical lines mark historical events relevant to that newspaper's period.

Score distribution by newspaper

Stacked bars show the share of each stance score. Use the model dropdown to switch between models.

Score distribution by model (all newspapers)

Full-corpus stance distribution collapsed across all newspapers and years, split by model.

Model benchmark — against human gold labels

Evaluated on 638 human-annotated articles. Metrics are computed on Algeria-relevant articles only (human score > 0). Gemma 4 DPO (fine-tuned)   Gemma 4 Base